I was recently asked, “Because people were willing to die for their belief, whether it was in a person
or a way of life or whatever it was, does that automatically make it true?”
This
is a very interesting question. I know there have been lots of martyrs of
varying cultural and religious backgrounds who have died for different reasons.
In looking through some of them (e.g. Ghandi, Nelson Mandela, Socrates, Martin
Luther King, Jr., etc.), I find myself wondering, “Is the actual belief they
died for, regardless of our other differences, something I would disagree with
today?” And, honestly, I think the answer is no.
The fact is, healthy, rational
people don’t give up their lives for a belief that, for them at least, is in
question. The truth of that belief matters a great deal and the stakes for
denying the truth of that belief and seen as so high that death is better than
disbelief. The most famous martyrs in history all died for something that, to me
at least, has the ring of truth.
Now, obviously, their contemporaries didn’t
believe similarly—otherwise, there would’ve been no reason to martyr oneself for
it. But, their deaths did make others sit up and take notice. Their deaths also
got the attention of more powerful, thoughtful, truth-seeking folks who spread
the message further.
So, I guess the answer to this question is: No, martyring
oneself for a belief doesn’t make it true. But, it’s certainly a good way to get
people to give it another look. And, martyrdom has done a great deal to
massively alter our global philosophies and humanitarian ideals.
No comments:
Post a Comment